The following cases were heard at Reading and Slough Magistrates’ Courts:
July 15
MURAD ZAYADI, 36, of Vernon Crescent, Reading, admitted failing to comply with supervision requirements following release from a period of detention. Fined £300.
ANGEL ATKINSON, 18, of Pages Orchard, Sonning Common, Reading, convicted of travelling on a railway without having paid a fare at Reading on February 8, 2022. Fined £220, made to pay compensation of £7.20 and ordered to pay £214 in court fees.
ANNE-MARIE BAILEY, 44, of Kennet Walk, Reading, convicted of travelling on a railway without having paid a fare at Sutton Coldfield on February 18, 2022. Fined £440, made to pay compensation of £120 and ordered to pay £214 in court fees.
NASH BELCHIOR, 39, of Highgrove Street, Reading, convicted of travelling on a railway without having paid a fare at Reading on February 7, 2022. Fined £60, made to pay compensation of £2.10 and ordered to pay £214 in court fees.
JACOB FRANCIS, 23, of Links Drive, Reading, convicted of travelling on a railway without having paid a fare at Theale on March 1, 2022. Fined £220, made to pay compensation of £7.30 and ordered to pay £214 in court fees.
GERARD POWER, 52, of London Street, Reading, convicted of travelling on a railway without having paid a fare at Reading on February 8, 2022. Fined £440, made to pay compensation of £26.60 and ordered to pay £224 in court fees.
JACK STANLEY, 29, of Pottery Road, Tilehurst, Reading, convicted of travelling on a railway without having paid a fare at Reading on February 8, 2022. Fined £220, made to pay compensation of £4.60 and ordered to pay £214 in court fees.
ADAM WAITE, 23, of Orchard Estate, Twyford, convicted of travelling on a railway without having paid a fare at Reading on February 18, 2022. Fined £220, made to pay compensation of £4.00 and ordered to pay £214 in court fees.
CLAIRE WHITE, 44, of Basingstoke Road, Riseley, Reading, convicted of travelling on a railway without having paid a fare at Reading on February 6, 2022. Fined £440, made to pay compensation of £2.90 and ordered to pay £224 in court fees.
A fundamental principle of justice is that it must be seen to be done. Open justice is acclaimed on a number of grounds: as a safeguard against judicial error, to assist the deterrent function of criminal trials and to permit the revelation of matters of interest.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here