Skip Navigation,Sitemap

Reading Chronicle

Letter: Don't dump the recycling progress

Correspondent • Published 1 Apr 2010 07:00 Mobiles Print Comments 0 Comments

Jump to first paragraph.

Share this Facebook Twitter Google Buzz Delicious DIGG Reddit Stumbleupon Email RSS

click to enlarge

See also:

READING Tories say they will introduce weekly bin collections as soon as "practically possible" as one of their main manifesto pledges for the local elections, combined with freezing council tax (Chronicle, March 25).

This is errant nonsense, at best a cheap stunt to boost their flagging campaign locally and nationally, at worst, a dishonest deceit which does not stand close scrutiny.

In fact it would prove "practically impossible" and cost council tax payers a great deal of money, leaving aside environmental and practical considerations. Using an extra fleet of trucks to pick up the black and red bins separately, will leave a massive carbon footprint, cause extra traffic congestion and will hinder our attempts to keep our narrow streets clear of bins when they are not being left out for collection.

Since the introduction of alternate weekly collections, combined with a dedicated green waste collection, recycling rates in Reading have hit an historic high and we are well on the way to an initial target of 40%.

Combined with the roll out of neighbourhood bottle banks, the improved facilities of the award-winning household waste recycling centre at Smallmead, and the deal we have struck to send 30,000 tons per year to a waste to energy plant near Heathrow, it has meant the amount we now send to landfill has decreased by roughly a third.

The Tory manifesto also blandly talks about "new methods" of recycling as if there was some magic wand to be waved, but I have to tell the public this is another deceit.

Reading BC has combined with Wokingham and Bracknell councils to form what is called the RE3 partnership, enabling us to build the new facilities at Smallmead but also to bring on stream more quickly other methods of recycling, the obvious example being food waste, but only when this is commercially viable. We are also actively looking to widen the scope for re-use of products that are thrown away and to increase the range of materials that can be recycled, most recently household oil, but all this work is underway and for Reading Tories to somehow claim they were the first to think of it, is at the best disingenuous.

Paul Gittings, Lead Cllr for Environment and Sustainability Reading Borough Council

Post a comment

Registered users log in here

If you are registered with us, you can login here. If you are not registered, do so now.
Once logged in you wont have to complete word verification each time you post.

Prefer not to register?

Usernames must be 4 - 20 characters. Registration only takes a few minutes. Registered users can also take part in competitions and other features of the site.


Enter the text as shown.

Return to the main index, get more from this section or browse our Opinion archives.

Other Stories

» View more stories

Super Tots in association with Lifestyle Images
Click Here
passthebatoninberkshire

Most Read

  1. Football club to donate cash to Alexander Devine appeal
  2. Reading linked with Joe Cole
  3. Residents must move after Woodley care home is axed
  4. Man killed at level crossing
  5. Woman held at knife point by hooded burglars
  6. 'It's an eyesore': Residents slam council for neglecting estate

» View More Stories

Competitions

» See all competitions

Hot Jobs

Taste

View our Taste Guide

Your social, local Business Directory - It's in ReadingIt's in The DirectoryDirectory Network

Copyright ©2012 Berkshire Media Group, 50/56 Portman Road Reading Berkshire RG30 1BA • Tel: 0118 955 3333 • Fax:

FacebooK Twitter RSS Feeds