The Householders Against Rushy Mead (Harm) campaigners say the Rushy Mead turbines could interfere with their sleep
See also:
May I suggest that those who are worried about noise from proposed wind turbines should pay a visit to the existing big one at Green Park? (Chronicle, 'Making noise about turbines', Feb 11)
They might detect a faint swish if they stand directly underneath it; a few metres away across the road, all you can hear is traffic, aeroplanes and the waterfalls at Lime Square.
I cannot see that new turbines at Rushy Mead will be audible by anybody in Arborfield, Shinfield or Lower Earley; the M4 is a much more serious source of noise pollution.
Adam Sowan, New Road, Reading
Have your say. Post a comment on this article.
The Realist
Unregistered User
Feb 19, 11:24
Report comment
Let's face it. Beyond the novelty value these things are an eyesore and contribute nothing when needed most, such as when the weather is cold with little wind due to having a high pressure area sat over the country - as has been the case for much of this winter.
So the argument here is that they should only be built in already noisy areas where they will be drowned out. Perhaps John Madejski should reconsider making the Station Hill development into a wind farm due to the town centre and train noise.
It's a such shame that many picturesque, tranquil rural landscapes around the UK have been blighted by these things, and as they really are economically non-viable due to the high level of subsidies needed, I expect to soon see them turning into rusting memorabilia of a time when the public were duped by gullible politicans into an "Act now - the End is Nigh!" charadern
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
the real-er-ist
Unregistered User
Feb 19, 12:06
Report comment
Bah, far from being eyesores I think they can actually look very graceful. I like to see them out of train windows and so on, and I think they look fantastic on the horizon when driving through the peak district.
The fact is we have to stop burning dead organic matter because it's screwing up our planet. Wind is only part of the solution - and off-shore wind, now that the technology is stepping up to the task, is probably going to be more important - but they will become more and more economically viable as the old forms of energy become more and more depleted and do more and more damage to our environment. We need to do more with other renewables too, and probably nuclear as well realistically, bu****hink wind is one of the ways to go.
If I had a backyard, I'd say they could build a turbine in it, but unfortunately all I have is a balcony...
You say they contribute nothing when they're needed the most, but the National Grid (ie the people who know) has time and again said wind power can fit in with other energy sources and that the variability of the electricity it generates is really not the major issue wind-detractors make it out to be. see for example:
www.businessgreen.com/business-green/news/2244492/national-grid-takes-wind-energy
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
Unregistered User
Feb 20, 12:33
Report comment
I believe that Mr Sowam may have been standing too close to hear the true effect of low frequency turbine noise. As I understand it, the noise vortice is conical with the point of the cone being at the turbine and the real doppler effect is only picked up further away.
On Mr Sowan's other point, in the dead of night the M4 noise ceases, Heathrow is on curfew but wind turbines continue to emit noise polution at an unsociable time when nearby residents are trying to sleep. Another important point is that the Five proposed Rushy Mead turbines are almost twice the size of the Single Green Park turbine!
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
sam
Unregistered User
Feb 20, 19:52
Report comment
Twice the size? On what measure? Although the above flyer says 130m, that's measuring the 'pylon' height and adding on the 50m rotor span. The height without the turbines is I think 80m, hence similar to Green Park, unless I'm missing something?
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
Martin McGill
Unregistered User
Feb 23, 16:46
Report comment
I think people will find that having a nearby windfarm will make them more interesting, dinner parties where they might have attracted a dentist and an estate agent will suddenly boast a Doctor or two and a smattering of property developers. Their children will have more interesting and better off friend simply so that they will be able to visit and see this serene, statuesque marvels for themselves, and a windfarm guarantees the land will not be used for houses. Look. On. The. Bright. Side. I wish I had a windfarm near me.
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
******
Feb 23, 16:52
Report comment
This comment has been removed by a moderator
******
Feb 23, 17:09
Report comment
This comment has been removed by a moderator
******
Feb 23, 17:10
Report comment
This comment has been removed by a moderator
Reading Chronicle
Unregistered User
Feb 24, 10:40
Report comment
F Connolly
Unregistered User
Feb 26, 17:28
Report comment
In order to judge a true perspective one has to look at the local topography.
The Green Park Turbine is sited on low lying land whereas the proposed Rushy Mead Turbines will be much higher.
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
Not a Nimby
Unregistered User
Feb 27, 11:31
Report comment
As suggested by Adam Sowan, I went to look at the Green Park Turbine yesterday lunchtime and have to say that I could only hear a slight "swishing" noise over and above the heavy M4 traffic.
However, the shadow flicker from the blades in relation to the sun was absolutely horrendous and casting right across the adjacent buildings onto the side of the Madejski Stadium. If this was a residential area instead of a trading estate it would have driven householders mad!
Having looked at this flickering for approximately 10 minutes I then had to sit in the car for a while until my eyes went out of "blink" mode. If I had driven off straight away then I would have been a danger to other road users.
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
Return to the main index, get more from this section or browse our Opinion archives.
Other Stories
You may have missed


Peppard Road
Sonning Common, Reading RG4 9NP
Tel: 0118 972 3230
Web: www.birdinhandsonningcommon.co.uk

53 Northbrook Street
Newbury, Berkshire RG14 1AN
Tel: 0118 9512 600
Web: www.artofsiamuk.com

John Nike Way
Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 8TF
Tel: 01344 303 333
Web: www.rowans-restaurant.com

High Street
Bray, Berkshire SL6 2AB
Tel:
Web: www.hindsheadhotel.com

Furze Platt Road
Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 6PR
Tel: 01628 777779
Web: www.robinhoodpub.co.uk

Henley Road, Hurley
Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LH
Tel: 01628 823558
Web: www.redlyon.co.uk
Your social, local Business Directory - It's in Reading | It's in The Directory | Directory Network
Copyright ©2012 Berkshire Media Group, 50/56 Portman Road Reading Berkshire RG30 1BA • Tel: 0118 955 3333 • Fax: