Council tax rise after Tories miss vote

Adam Hewitt • Published 24 Feb 2010 00:05 7 Comments

See also:

COUNCIL tax will go up by 2.2% in Reading from April after the ruling Labour group's budget was passed - while the Tories were out of the room.

During a four-hour negotiation session tonight (Tuesday) in which the three main parties were completely deadlocked, only Labour put forward a budget, which included extra money to cope with booming demand for social services but also savings across all departments.

The opposition Tories rejected this, pledging a council tax freeze which they said was the right thing to do with so many people struggling to make ends meet in the town.

The meeting was adjourned multiple times so the parties could make a deal, since setting a budget is a legal requirement, but the Tories were late back from the third adjournment and so missed the vital vote where Labour voted to approve its budget. The Lib Dems voted against but the vote was carried, 19 to eight.

Chairing the meeting of the full council was Cllr Fred Pugh, the borough's Conservative mayor, who announced that the reconvened meeting was quorate and the vote legitimate, since the time to be back had been set in advance.

In a follow-up vote to set the council tax for the year, after more debate the Tories and Lib Dems abstained, with Tory leader Andrew Cumpsty invoking councillors' "civic responsibility" to get a budget passed and council tax set but making clear his displeasure that the vote went ahead while his group were in talks in another room.

He said: "People in this chamber knew we were working behind the scenes in order to deliver a 0% increase. It's deeply regrettable that the increase was pushed through."

Council leader and Labour group leader Cllr Jo Lovelock rejected that, saying: "We were back in here at the right time, the vote was taken properly."

She said finding another £1.4m in savings from the budget to afford a council tax freeze was impossible without hitting frontline services, adding: "This budget achieves the right balance in uncertain times."

Lib Dem leader Kirsten Bayes, who had been in talks with the Tories but failed to reach agreement, according to Cllr Cumpsty, said she was unhappy with the council tax increase but also that the Conservatives had not come up with any budget proposals for people in the town to examine and make a decision on.

She added that Cllr Cumpsty was wrong to say the budget vote had been "pushed through".

She said: "The mayor was in the room and the meeting was quorate. You have to respect the democratic and legal procedures of the council."

The meeting ended at 11.40pm.

For more on the council tax rise and how it will affect you, see Thursday's Reading Chronicle.

Have your say. Post a comment on this article.

Abbey Nationalist
Unregistered User
Feb 24, 07:19
Report comment

Isn't this the second year running that the Conservatives have failed to propose a Budget? Surely they had all year to get organised? Sorry, but this doesn't look very professional to me. They could at least have voted against the Labour Budget if they didn't like it.

Recommend? Yes 0 No 0
Colin Lee
Unregistered User
Feb 24, 10:47
Report comment

All talk, and no substance, Cllr Cumpsty. I would have thought after last year's performance you would have been only to happy to come with a ready prepared 0% increase budget to prove your policy. No such luck. Also it appears that Reading's Cllr Lovelock's self-branded "below inflation" increase is above the average being set by other councils. All this just goes to show that politics in Reading is spin, spin and more spin. And they want us to believe them as credible representatives of the town!

Recommend? Yes 0 No 0
Bob
Unregistered User
Feb 24, 11:28
Report comment

he just wants to put council tax freeze on his leaflets but doesn't want people to know what his party will cut by actually putting together a budget. good politics, bad for Reading.

Recommend? Yes 0 No 0
Howard Thomas
Unregistered User
Feb 24, 20:40
Report comment

Perhaps the 'nasty'party might be best renamed as the clueless party !

Recommend? Yes 0 No 0
Alex M
Unregistered User
Feb 25, 15:53
Report comment

I'm sorry, but as a Tory, I am truly shocked by the sheer incompetence of our local Conservative leader.

It's astonishing after all the cock ups he has made that he continues to enjoy the confidence of the Conservative Group on RBC.

Recommend? Yes 0 No 0
mick pollek
Unregistered User
Feb 26, 15:46
Report comment

Not all the Tories were late. Fred Pugh managed to take his seat on time. It just shows that the Tories are nothing but smoke and mirrors. So devious that they confused themselvees, 2 years running

Recommend? Yes 0 No 0
Howard Thomas
Unregistered User
Feb 27, 20:11
Report comment

The telling thing here is that the Libdems were prepared to vote with the Tories to achieve a 'no increase' situation, provided that the Tories could tell them how it could be done. Despite having had a whole year from the last time that the Tories wanted a nil rise to work out how to do it , they were unable to convince the Libdems and so once again the Tory contribution was effectively nothing!

And they would like to take over the council------they wouldn't be able to duck the issue then!!

Recommend? Yes 0 No 0

Return to the main index, get more from this section or browse our News archives.

Follow @rdgchronicle