Skip Navigation, Sitemap

Reading Chronicle

Published: Wednesday, 25th February, 2009 11:28am

Council tax negotiations end in turmoil

Profile by Adam Hewitt

Comments (2) | Print | Email

Image related to story 9804, see caption or article text

A COMPLETE logjam shut down budget negotiations in Reading as the three parties refused to compromise.

The council meeting to set council tax levels on Tuesday night dragged on until past 11pm but still had to be adjourned until tonight because Labour, the Tories and the Lib Dems on the hung borough council could not reach agreement.

The Tories demanded a freeze on council tax at its 2008/9 level. Officials estimated this would need £2.7m of further cuts from Labour's proposed budget, which is dependant on a 4.24% tax hike.

The Lib Dems suggested cutting agency workers, consultants and the sandwich budget to reduce the tax hike to 3.99%, but still made room for their favoured projects like free bulky waste removal for more residents, a fly-tipping hit squad, and extra speed guns for streets plagued by boy racers. They also wanted to freeze councillors' allowances.

But the other parties condemned their proposal as "tinkering at the edges" and said agency staff played a vital role in caring for elderly people and providing cover when staff were off sick in the social services department.

The Tories were in turn criticised for not coming up with an alternative budget at all while Labour were panned for plundering council reserves to keep council tax low before last year's local elections but for proposing an inflation-busting rise this election-free year.

The meeting broke up just before 9pm after no two parties could reach an agreement on a figure - but nearly an hour-and-a-half later after strained discussions between the party leaders and top officials, there was still no movement.

Labour has 19 councillors and minority control of the council, while the Tories have 18 and the Lib Dems 8 councillors. There is one independent, Cllr Tony Jones, who was not at last night's meeting.

After a series of inconclusive votes, Labour leader Jo Lovelock said: "I'm really disappointed. The Conservatives talk about efficiencies, what this is code for is privatisation. They should have had a list of amendments tonight, but instead we've just heard vague promises. They will be going out telling the people of Reading that only the Conservatives can deliver a 0% council tax increase - but let's get real.

"For the Lib Dems, it's not about delivering services, it's about the newsletters and sound-bytes and results in Reading East."

She was referring to the parliamentary ambitions of Lib Dem leader Cllr Gareth Epps, who said afterwards: "Labour councillors showed no signs of understanding they no longer have a majority. Their idea of negotiation involved no compromise but demands that Liberal Democrats cave in. Their actions tonight have dealt a huge blow to their authority and credibility in Reading.

"The 18 Conservative Councillors failed even to table an amendment. They should realise that they have a responsibility to set a budget and cannot indulge in gesture politics.

"We have behaved openly and with integrity. We tabled our amendment and sought to use it or any other ideas as the basis for negotiations. It is up to Labour and/or the Conservatives to table a proposal in writing. We shall examine any such proposal seriously."

Conservative Cllr Mark Ralph said the council should be renegotiating contracts, switching suppliers and reviewing pay structures to make savings, while Cllr Richard Willis said: "Last year's budget should have set a precedent that we can have a low council tax increase.

"The Lib Dem amendment would save the average council taxpayer about £3 a year, it's completely irrelevant."

Tory Leader Cllr Andrew Cumpsty proposed a performance improvement programme across the whole council to deliver better value for money and said: "We cannot and should not be looking to set a council tax which piles on extra pressures to the residents of Reading at a time when they are struggling."

He promised investment in and improvement of children's services, maintaining funding for community care for the elderly and the current grant level to the voluntary sector.

The full council will reconvene at 6.30pm tonight at Reading Civic Centre. The meeting is open to the public.

For more stories and your full round up of what's happening in Reading you can purchase the e-edition of the Reading Chronicle click here.

  • Damocles

    Feb 26 09 11:05

    Our Ref: 2759
    Please this ref number if you wish to report this comment.
    Report this comment

    Can Cllr Cumpsty explain how the Conservatives are going to deliver £2.7 million of savings, the reduction in budget needed to secure a zero increase in Council tax bills? More importantly, what substantive evidence can he give the public that his party is capable of delivering this without bankrupting the Council in the process or reducing further the quality of service to the community.

    It would be nice if the Tory proposals could be put in writing in advance of the meeting next Monday for scrutiny and to determine whether it is credible or as I suspect just puffery.



    Let’s be blunt about this – it is easy to make grandiose statements and to change figures on paper, but the success of sound budgeting, in the real world, is in the delivery and not the spin.

  • BGarvie
    (Unregistered User)


    Feb 26 09 14:56

    Our Ref: 2761
    Please this ref number if you wish to report this comment.
    Report this comment

    Council tax bills are expected to increase by an average of 3.5% across England in April. However, Reading Councillor Lovelock’s Labour group (19 Councillors) propose a massive RBC council tax rise for 2009/10 of 4.24%. With police, fire & rescue services precepts added produce a total of 4.33%. This is a totally unacceptable figure that frightens many constituents because it is well over four times the rate of inflation of 0.01%. (RPI figures 0.01% on 17/02/09). How are the low paid and pensioners supposed to survive.

    In 2008, 23 years of Labour’s control of RBC ended. However, since 1997 Labour has increased council tax by over 100%, a truly extortionate record. The constituents of Reading know Labour is inefficient and unrealistic when they obfuscate and criticise whilst pushing through unacceptable increases. Under Labour control RBC had a reputation as a high spending local authority, the most profligate in the country (Reading Post 14th Feb. 2009). Fortunately, they are now being held to account by the well supported 18 Conservative Tory Councillors who intend scrutinising and challenging every facet of Labour’s extortionate 4.24% proposal. The Lib/Dem package of 3.99% is equally unacceptable.

    Lovelock’s group would do well to follow the example of the Conservative London Borough of Hounslow who has NOT increased council tax for the past three years. Their Tax band ‘D’ £1090.65 has remained the same for 2006/07, 2007/08, 2008/09. They have NOT reduced services and also found internal savings over three years of £53 million. (Band ‘D’ in Reading is £1,471.06).

    Reading’s constituents want a freeze on council tax. With the financial crisis severely affecting every constituent, they want similar savings and less pressure on their personal finances. How do the Labour and Lib/Dem Councillors expect pensioners and the less well off on fixed incomes to pay these increased charges? With severe pressure on personal finances, with pensions ruined, savings devastated, houses being repossessed, jobs and businesses collapsing, this is grossly unfair. If Hounslow and other councils can achieve massive savings, then so should RBC. It is about time they managed internal efficiency savings and trimmed their budget.

    Labour’s and the Lib/Dem proposals are unfair,unsustainable, too expensive and way above the rate of inflation. It is time to end this annual fleecing of constituents.

commentsComments

Any abusive comments or comments with swearing or racist undertones will be removed from this site.

Any comments urging people to vote for specific political parties will be deleted as spam

Post a comment

*required

*required




Captcha Image, filename 0594687.jpg

For your convenience, you can now register with our website (which will save you from having to retype your name each time you post a comment). If you would like to do this (or have already!) then please Log in or Register

 Profit Masters Club - Sharing knowledge to take your business the distance

Photosales Search

Time for Me

News from around Berkshire