Anger over child benefit cuts
by Rob Sleigh
CHILDREN and family charities and playgroups have reacted angrily to the scrapping of universal child benefits.
Chancellor George Osborne announced yesterday (Monday) that middle-income families will no longer receive the benefit if one or more parents are in the top tax bracket, earning £44,000 a year or more.
Ruth Fleming, senior organiser at the Home-Start family support charity in Lyon Square, Tilehurst, said: “I think it could be quite tough for middle-income Britain with young families.
“Some people have quite hefty mortgages and as the cost of living increases, they’re going to have higher bills to pay and, negatively, there will be an impact on family life.”
Vanessa Best, deputy supervisor at Pangbourne Valley Playgroup, based in Kennedy Drive, said: “They’re trying to encourage mothers to work, so it penalizes you for earning more money. It always seems to hit that level. It’s almost as if, if you don’t work, you’re better off and you get more benefits.”
Jan Fishwick, chief executive of Parents and Children Together (PACT) in South Street, Reading said: “We need to be sure that more disadvantaged children benefit from the state child benefit system. I’m very keen that those families will continue to get the benefit.
"I believe that those families earning less than £44,000 don’t need it as much. It’s not as fair for mothers who choose to stay at home to look after their children. Parents who choose to stay behind at home to look after their children, they don’t get as fair a deal.
"I’m very much in favour of families on lower income still receiving the benefits. If that means some families on higher incomes have to forgo their benefits, rather than people on lower income paying more tax, then I think that’s fairer.”
Natasha Van Vliet, director of Development at Family Resource Centre in Milford Road, Reading, said: “We’re here to help families and to ensure that they reach their full potential. Any financial implications on them are going to have an impact.
“What we will be doing is making sure our Benefits Information team are up to speed on what these cuts are going to mean for families. We will also be encouraging families to get in touch with us to find out whether they are likely to be one of the families to have their benefits cut and, if so, what the impact will be on their family’s income.
"Our team will help them to try to find ways to save money so the impact isn’t so harsh for them. There are quite a few working families in Reading and across the South East, so it is likely to be an area where families will feel the pinch. Anything that is going to cause an impact on children is not to be taken lightly. The welfare of children should be first and foremost, so hopefully the Government has considered it at great length.”
Labour’s childrens’ services spokesman Cllr John Ennis said: “Last year they made a full commitment to keep universal benefits. They said the cuts would go somewhere else, but now they’ve changed their minds. One parent on £50,000 will lose out, whereas two parents on £40,000 won’t. Hard-working families on modest incomes will lose out. Very wealthy families will also lose out, but they can afford to. One parent earning that money will be worse off than two parents earning. I don’t think they’ve thought it through.”
Critics have already rounded on the chancellor for the “unfair” nature of the cut, as single-earner households will feel the pinch if one parent earns £44,000 and another stays at home, but dual-income familes where both parents earn just under the cap will keep all their child benefit.
Alison Garnham, chief executive of the Child Poverty Action Group, said: “It’s very unfair that families with children should once again be taking the hit. Child benefit is a strategic benefit that works. It’s simple and everybody understands it. Even in better-off families parents face the costs of raising children.”
But other thinktanks, including Demos and Civitas, have backed the move saying it is unfair that people being taxed on £18,000 earnings are helping to support the children of those on £50,000.
Work and pensions secretary Iain Duncan Smith said it was not a change the Government would want to make in an ideal world, but that money had to be saved to get the deficit under control.
The £1bn saved by cutting child benefit is expected to ultimately help fund the Government’s push towards a 'universal benefit’, merging the current complex system of benefits and tax credits into a cheaper scheme which ministers say will always encourage work.
Have your say. Post a comment on this article.
-
Disapointed Dad
Unregistered User
Oct 5, 13:41
Report commentI can't belive they are taking it away from families where one parent earns over, maybe just over the £44k, however a famliy with a combined income of £87k can keep it. Most of Britian will not stand for this. I have a young family, large mortgage and need this money.
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
-
Tom_Ainsworth
Unregistered User
Oct 5, 14:30
Report commentYou'd think the average wage in this country was £44,000! It's not, it's in the mid-£20,000s. Let's just remember that - stuff is going to get cut, obviously. It would hardly be right if public services the poorest rely on get slashed, but that the benefits for richer people, some of whom use private services anyway, are kept.
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
-
Angry
Unregistered User
Oct 5, 14:43
Report commentWhat a joke. The Conservatives flat lied during their campaign about this. I'm done with them - everyone thought the alternative was worse, how wrong I was. What happens for step-families where the step-dad earns £44K, mum has two children from her first marriage and 1 with her new husband and she works as many hours at they can as well as rasing children but only earns
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
-
Angry
Unregistered User
Oct 5, 14:45
Report commentless than £10K and the family receives a pittance from the real father? Honestly, how can this be social justice. Also, I'm sick of hearing that people earning £20K pay for my child benefit - I pay more tax at £40K which ends up in their pocket than they do in mine.
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
-
Tanya
Unregistered User
Oct 5, 14:54
Report commentMyself and my partner both work and we just go over the £44K and we have 2 children that we receive family allowance for and I am in favour of the cut. Though i also believe that we should enforce a system which prevents single mothers and low income families from benefiting from continually having large families which they are unable to support themselves.We need to make cuts at both ends of the social spectrum.
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
-
Jason
Unregistered User
Oct 5, 15:10
Report commentSo a family income of over 44k gets hammered while a family income of 80k is not effected - how exactly is that fair? Various part timers who work for me have refused to do more hours even when I desperately need them to -- on the basis that it is not worth their while as they earn the equivalant in benefits!!!??? Should rich boy Cameron not be dealing with inefficencies like this rather than hitting hard working - tax paying households???
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
-
Disgruntled
Unregistered User
Oct 5, 16:51
Report commentChild Benefit removal for 40% tax payers will save about £1 bn p.a. and look at the pandemonium this has created ! Only another £82 bn to find then.
The government regards each taxpayer as a Contributory Unit of National Taxation.
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
-
angrygran
Unregistered User
Oct 5, 18:10
Report commentI am so angry, how dare he interfere with child benefit, he is taking the food out of the childrens mouths. Who does he think he is !
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
-
livid
Unregistered User
Oct 5, 18:18
Report commentjust seen on the news that the bankers are to get an estimated £7 bn in bonuses , say no more !!!
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
-
Tom_Ainsworth
Unregistered User
Oct 5, 18:30
Report commentAngrygran, are you being sarcastic? Anyone on £44,000-plus who cannot feed their children needs to seriously sort their priorities out.
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
-
WORKINGMUM
Unregistered User
Oct 5, 18:47
Report commentI AGREE WTH THE COMMENT ABOVE, IF YOUR EARNING 44K-PLUS YOU NOT EXACTLY ON THE BREAD LINE STOP MOANING AND JUST GET ON WITH IT. TRY DOWNSIZING SOME PEOPLE REALLY CANT AFFORD TO FEED THERE KIDS AND THEY WORK.
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
-
Tired Mum
Unregistered User
Oct 5, 20:01
Report commentWorkingmum, You cannot possibly comment on people`s situations. Angry explained a typical situation for a lot of families. Sometimes it feels like we both work for nothing, love to pack it all in and get a council house with no council tax to pay etc,etc!!!! Losing that money may push me over the edge!!
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
-
Angry
Unregistered User
Oct 6, 10:28
Report commentPeople earning £44K are not mega rich. I have sacrificed time and money with my child for the first 3 .5 years of her life in order to imoprove myself through doing a masters whilst working at the same time. I love how anyone earning less than £44K believes we should just take the medicine, downsize our house, sell our car and get on with it. I owe money from the masters - I pay more tax because of it and now I lose out again. Not exactly social mobility in action! Graduates and post-graduates usually pay more tax because they bothered to apply themselves to 4 years of study and exams, now they are going to be taxed for their studies for their whole life, lose child benefit, probably pay more basic rate of tax, it goes on and on. Honestly, why should anyone bother to aspire in this country.
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
-
TheTescoWorker
Unregistered User
Oct 7, 02:02
Report commentI'm not entirely sure but am I the only one in the country that loves these recent revelations from the Tories that make me a non-voter want to vote for them next time a election comes about! I am 19 and earn £9000 - £13,000 per annum. I think anyone suckling of benefits that is available for work should get off there backside and make effort to get a job! Yes, there is a lack of jobs in areas but Reading now isn't one of them! There's plenty of jobs about that most tax stealing losers could get! It just really annoys me to see news story's of people getting £40,000 - £90,000 per annum on benefits!!! Its just not on! This country would be a far better place, much richer and debt free if people stopped being lazy! Prime Minister Cameron has made a move Blair and Brown should of made a long time ago! Its about time people learnt they cant get a free ride in a fancy car chauffeured by the government and British tax payer. Aside this, over a period of time tax will go down and the United Kingdom will be rivalling global power over the United States of America again! Oh and we need to lose the Queen and royal family! UK needs a President and not a Queen that does BLEEP all :/
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
-
Anon
Unregistered User
Oct 7, 03:40
Report commentI am currently studying for a high-wage job, and I also plan to have children in the future. Honestly, when that time comes, i'm not going to cry over the loss of £17 a week. I do however agree it should be dependant on household income, rather than individual.
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
-
Lizzy
Unregistered User
Oct 8, 21:12
Report commentIf you work hard you gain nothing in this country. I could have given up work when I had my children, but I chose to work to ensure financial stability for my family. Other people make different choices and don't work. I don't think that I should be penalised for this. I will reduce my hours to ensure that I earn below the threshold as I'm marginally over it. Play the game - why not.
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
-
KidTax
Unregistered User
Oct 9, 12:03
Report commentLove the £17 a week comment. Completely missing the point that a family (or single parent) with 3 kids is actually losing £55 a week - i.e. about £5k per annum before tax. (this gets higher with every kid). We're basically implementing a tax on having children for mid to high earners. There will definitely come a point when it will be worth going to a 4 days a week for some parents.
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
-
Sterling
Unregistered User
Oct 10, 05:34
Report commentI have sympathy for the many concerned comments made above. However, there is no more money and cuts in Government spending have to be made. As a result of the disastrous financial legacy left by incompetent Labour, the Government is borrowing over £500,000,000 million per DAY of which approximately £150,000,000 million is in interest payments alone. This is unsustainable and has to be brought under control. Brown's legacy of debt and despair has left this country with a bigger deficit that the country experienced after the first and second World wars. The interest payments alone exceed our defence and education budgets and have to be lowered.
Remember benefits are a safety net for the needy, not a life style enhancement; nobody would say those earning over £45K are in the needy category. A proper sense of proportion must be maintained because less than 15% of households will be affected. Those on lower incomes will experience no change to their child benefits.
Recommend?
Yes 0
No 0
Return to the main index, get more from this section or browse our News archives.


















