Tuesday, 6th January, 2009 RSS Feeds
Add to Google Add to My Yahoo! (requires My Yahoo account). Add to My MSN (requires My MSN account). Add to My AOL (requires My AOL account).

Published: Thursday, 2nd October, 2008 07:00

Momentum builds in campaign to save church

By Rose Harland

Comment Bubble Comments (1) Printer Print Article
Image related to story, see caption or article text

MP Martin Salter, Adam Shepherd, David Shepherd, Russell Thickett, Norman Dawson, Ray Clarke, Peter Cleary and Cathryn Mackinlay protest outside St Saviour's Church

Pic by: Leigh Quinell

A BUILDING conservation group and an MP have joined the campaign to save St Saviour’s church from redevelopment.

Leaders of the Elim Pentecostal church in Coley say it is necessary to knock down the Victorian red brick building to make way for a community centre, a move opposed by many of its neighbours.

But campaign group Save Britain’s Heritage has now stepped into the row. In a letter to the borough council planning department, president Marcus Binney said: “This is not only an impressive landmark but the focal point of an interesting and attractive group of historic red brick buildings. We believe that there may be considerable archeological interest in the site arising out of the chalk mines, the area’s brick-making history and the Coley brick kiln which once existed here.

“In our view the scale of the redevelopment proposed will upset the peaceful and pleasant residential atmosphere of the neighbourhood. It also goes against sustainable principles to demolish such a substantially built structure.”

The group wants the church, and nearby Field Road, Wolseley Street and Coley Place down to Berkeley Avenue, to be declared a conservation area. Reading West MP Martin Salter wants planning officers to block the redevelopment. He said: “This demolition would include removing the entire Victorian part of the church, which I believe is of architectural value and has been at the heart of the Coley community for well over a century. Local residents are firmly against the construction of a modern replacement to St Saviour’s Church and although they recognise that the current church services are well attended at the weekends, they are also concerned that a larger church building with more church attendees would create further traffic and parking problems.”

A 350-name protest petition has been gathered and Church Terrace resident Cathryn Mackinlay, 31, said: “I think demolishing the church would ruin the feeling of this old area. Lots of people decided to move here because of it.”

The church says the redevelopment is vital to accommodate more children’s and community work.

Senior church leader Rev Billy Fenning said: “We appreciate the iconic nature of the building and want to make use of some of that in our new building. For example, we want to maintain a large proportion of the stained glass. Anyone who has seen our plans will know that we are looking to build a high quality church facility in place of what is already there.”

The plans are due to go before planners on November 5. The deadline for comments has now passed, but residents can contact MP Martin Salter on 954 6782 or email salterm@parliament.uk

Local Resident

(Unregistered User)

Oct 3 08 15:31

Our Ref: 662

Use the ref number if you need to report this comment

I have watched with sadness and disbelief the actions of Mr Billy Fenning,pastor of St Saviours church, with regard to his apparent lack of concern for the character and identity of the local community. I made a home in the vicinty of this beautiful building ten years ago and the first coresspondance ever received from Mr Fenning was the notification of his plans to demolish this historic part of our communty. As well as being a beautiful piece of historic architecture,the spaces available within the church are perfectly adequate to accomdate all normal church activities that one might expect to take place. When invited to the church to discuss the affect of the demolition,I was told by one of Mr fennings' supporters "We have the money and we will do whatever we want." Replying that I didn't beleive this to be the most spiritual approach, I was told angrily "Don't argue"!

We must stop this potential vandalism and failure to empathise, both physically and spiritually,with the local people and community.

Report this comment

comments Comments

Post a comment

Your Name: * Note this is a Required Field *

Your Email: * Note this is a Required Field *

Your Comment:


Characters Left:

Word verification:

Captcha Image, filename 0003249.jpg

For your convenience, you can now register with our website (which will save you from having to retype your name each time you post a comment). If you would like to do this (or have already!) then please Log in or Register

Chronicle Advertisement

Deals

Special Publications

Most Read